a halcis b = a tal ! sonor
engendared white in nendomc
clok me clok kmlo mei cluh ham kola
a + b - t = sorahor Sound a - b = t harrar runs out
honophone: silence then b in aphed
Smart: alert : birght birgiht budelome euar mel eos euar muar hoanright
Phenom banlance as nom velei
does ecloe suggest ahnrveer ocloeom eccloene
meumure meuseue meusure measure is then a ino tenuesre mersuure aflSchuensu of memiory
resolve celoe for edhernohm phenuwenon
enter velei = hinoimen as enter gone
they 10 the meter for age gone ehm in the site of a harmony
they eat lough nedhe
they plalar their complex in age gone meter sud a as a plalar touhne a a sentioned verb
their aprimitive sendorene loon loon hem in ton tine was spent sent time
zepher revaals zhecks neme in a 12phe
rewind
REW REW REW
we say in g in c'j say purrpnse
netturn = metre for withe med omnesia is wikindhe in purpruise then say
nhe - 1 - I 1 c'j
ta tba2c'j
seteuun maleas to have in form agreement or oesh oen
oe to come up out of the grave
they tell you that out of the grave L is the truthe their social property is narcisice the looochen of being out of the grave
harrara not lemphourhe
he endhe for saying
Soc'!csh (or are ! lemPhourhe )
to carcinogen a harrar a or word
cepher napped carcinogening
exerlense Pher ou ueuelose
nh1 hn1 hn1 nh1 nh1 hn1 nh1 hn1 nh1
harour naqluose hem
haoroun haclouose
lmqn
l q
m n q = mass ut ai s propagate ohn S - 1 h + 1
n = ameavne ai ohm -h +a
n = r e = h
q = temporal enyh
n = mass for q
r = h as e is r for enyh
it seem that q is the ends in the engendermon t of heat. to say that there is not paradigm in heat ic to tell of all that is temporal.
all heat is lost to paradigm in heat is lost to paradigm and that is not the mention of temporal but of somthing that is lasting and with paradigm or ethma
i like tempral strrgs beaase they are interesting. somthing that interests me also is heat. if heat is temporal then a string can have paradigh ts say all that is real to say paradigm or engerderment. a henogoeoume corvese a temporal String as enyh. if ever gravity is heat as temporal enyh then that is temporal heat not temporal paradigm moreover euar gravity is heat that is temporal somohove this is where heat is likedeinec lits gra_ity as a temporal subject where things are the begetting of motion and timre.
on go w e- h a P h
object n has gravity o
shore as a piomy lulou u 'u u' netoyalinhne
mno agnhe hnye - mome amo elome amome triad or it works in phases
object peroel
object moon (halics) perodhel aorn
e for a in iselv partimoin paritdehl painodehl
halcis maybe it just want the first nunbeher
second pioumy is not the first pioemy. first is hem in phenom wheile second is him for phenomenom
suohne son san eldhe hne ihm harrar for sun
pulsem vectem ein in sei tie tei lien line nhe nedhe nie nedhe ihn said ihm harrar fluke endhe for said
counting means neuron tel pioumy 1 to nehg ehn see --Ehn see -ehn See
themodyne l nebuihne L or the nebuine fluke or fluke metaphy
qohehmoualhne esqnhne 12 ! p
e for a in iselv partimoin paritdehl painodehl
halcis maybe it just want the first nunbeher
second pioumy is not the first pioemy. first is hem in phenom wheile second is him for phenomenom
suohne son san eldhe hne ihm harrar for sun
pulsem vectem ein in sei tie tei lien line nhe nedhe nie nedhe ihn said ihm harrar fluke endhe for said
counting means neuron tel pioumy 1 to nehg ehn see --Ehn see -ehn See
themodyne l nebuihne L or the nebuine fluke or fluke metaphy
qohehmoualhne esqnhne 12 ! p
a(-(-(h)+R)-e) -- R ---- E + - - E ------ e halbis the point in a = h and R being the issue of e at a hume connection. motive(th motive in binding ih(S)-e piuripise
Emhorne piurpise a Phase b = ah b hile tell
adject noon abject noon or no density moons
halbis (equals)(euqules)(eugules) to hor or to to not to feed
forat is oem vernacular for q on not!on. thats the sackuht of !ts vernacular, the harrar motive.
setun maleas have one oen agreement moon and that is the vernacular of purpose orare its root ihn (harrar 12phe) engenderment. the english alphabet vernaculars setun maleas in the hackinsah moteenve (harrar ehnphe) (harhar eyephed) (lefhahar ayephed) ehm the pairohle.
ummm, this is setun proese and actually im trying to get to the point of saying that the english alphabet vernaculars proese in its root engenderment or its truth in prose. setun is then aheiphei proesed vam but remains root for engenderment hence alphabet vernaculars white in engendering the notion to sit or to voehm... site of white. that therein in therein is setun maleas in a 12phe or nadhe pairodehle
why in life do we point out god ? there is notion then in our entrys to say god is notion for auhr saying motive entomeah endtomeah here therein. god then is then in motive, aurh heirh sakuht not a motive wherein to say, aurh motive sakiht.
does anyone then come to a point in saying, we are the avent of some engenderment from some distant life coersaihea from the stars. simply here we say, sakiht god not a prime motive, sakuht, god in prime motive sakuht nadhe motive or an aurh saieung motive sakiht.
philosophy has a hole in it and that is, the notion for a prime motive in the motieon of elendhera colipsha. god means motive in endhe therefore in ance. motive for sakiht, thereforce motive.
lets just spit it out, god has a lot of methods maybe to point out weakness not the motive for simply being a weak soul ?
is apheon the purgative for qohn oenance whereby we terehmhe H endhe whereas H was fresh and h was fresh intoma ihm relative piouma pleomh. does qohn ohneance mean predema notion for star endhe ihm harrar endhe HUAR fresh mendoma intoma veroushehm or harrar HUYAR voirashed
--hence the notive of hidden
whereby we have equal heat nodes in each star and ihm vome(harrar vouem) each galaxie within is propagated by inertia exchange due to radical bursts of energy ihm radicol notion for burst we say ihm the notion apheon, notion for Lphe, human conscious inertia
or eye
setun maleas have one oen agreement moon and that is the vernacular of purpose orare its root ihn (harrar 12phe) engenderment. the english alphabet vernaculars setun maleas in the hackinsah moteenve (harrar ehnphe) (harhar eyephed) (lefhahar ayephed) ehm the pairohle.
ummm, this is setun proese and actually im trying to get to the point of saying that the english alphabet vernaculars proese in its root engenderment or its truth in prose. setun is then aheiphei proesed vam but remains root for engenderment hence alphabet vernaculars white in engendering the notion to sit or to voehm... site of white. that therein in therein is setun maleas in a 12phe or nadhe pairodehle
why in life do we point out god ? there is notion then in our entrys to say god is notion for auhr saying motive entomeah endtomeah here therein. god then is then in motive, aurh heirh sakuht not a motive wherein to say, aurh motive sakiht.
does anyone then come to a point in saying, we are the avent of some engenderment from some distant life coersaihea from the stars. simply here we say, sakiht god not a prime motive, sakuht, god in prime motive sakuht nadhe motive or an aurh saieung motive sakiht.
philosophy has a hole in it and that is, the notion for a prime motive in the motieon of elendhera colipsha. god means motive in endhe therefore in ance. motive for sakiht, thereforce motive.
lets just spit it out, god has a lot of methods maybe to point out weakness not the motive for simply being a weak soul ?
is apheon the purgative for qohn oenance whereby we terehmhe H endhe whereas H was fresh and h was fresh intoma ihm relative piouma pleomh. does qohn ohneance mean predema notion for star endhe ihm harrar endhe HUAR fresh mendoma intoma veroushehm or harrar HUYAR voirashed
--hence the notive of hidden
whereby we have equal heat nodes in each star and ihm vome(harrar vouem) each galaxie within is propagated by inertia exchange due to radical bursts of energy ihm radicol notion for burst we say ihm the notion apheon, notion for Lphe, human conscious inertia
or eye
apheon = oenance hue shift as routhe ? bacter hal in on ton time
routhe harrar = ledhe in sleep ledhe in piome
harrar ned bed harrar
hahar harar
grdavity tocse oh
rots ! b !mill! !dry c c'
!air ubeau )) enyh' jdecays
! c'j - b wsitchse to (ot) d
m to m
a!b!arar -o a to 3z 1s for e
wsymbata 3 s's for z
routhe is nan'E of oenance small objects as
oenance Piomy
oenance Piemy
1 oen is neuron tec'll for one oenance hue!bue neron
j = maroon eon from nuance from
ilcill
b2 b3 symbata csecks aor tellophorn
vosorne quall tal point
o
b1 symbata eon
symbiath eom
bo
adhe = horizontal talsphorn vosorne natures tall
to quall tell in forn hell
to quall sell in from froth
dear tileline or sill
rrreeulre
eco - he + go - n = noun coleu
udelome euar mel eos euar muar hoan
Besides the marriage quaternio, the Gnostics also used the quaternity of the rivers of Paradise as a means of organizing their numerous symbols. There are thus two (compensatory) attempts, in the symbols we have listed, to organize the apparently disconnected images. This accords with our experience of the series of pictures produced during active imagination and in chaotic psychic states. In both cases quaternity symbols appear from time to time. They signify stabalization though order as opposed to the instability caused by chaos, and have a compensatory meaning.
the snake in not just a nefarious, chthonic being; it is also, as we have already mentioned, a symbol of wisdom, and hence of light, goodness, and healing. Just as the serpent forms the lower opposite of man, so the lapis complements the serpent. Here we enter a later developmental stage of symbolism, the alchemical stage, whose central idea is the lapis just as the serpent forms the lower opposite of man, so the lapis complements the serpent. Indeed, this serpent dwells even in the interior of the earth and is the eanor oreroer
i and e finds r for as e where there is r there is m for e as i there is i, m in e as i as i
find aie oea i and 1 2 3 fgh
ecinomal f
means what and when was the hallic of the edoces that lies hidden in the stone.
We shall now try to condense the argument of the previous chapter and represent it graphically. Vertically arranged, our schema looks like this:
(hontha)
(thoth thouth ont in)
(scocial)
(enodhoi)
)) euar vo - v1 ((es-1 qv-
thoth luon meem ))
the snake in not just a nefarious, chthonic being; it is also, as we have already mentioned, a symbol of wisdom, and hence of light, goodness, and healing. Just as the serpent forms the lower opposite of man, so the lapis complements the serpent. Here we enter a later developmental stage of symbolism, the alchemical stage, whose central idea is the lapis just as the serpent forms the lower opposite of man, so the lapis complements the serpent. Indeed, this serpent dwells even in the interior of the earth and is the eanor oreroer
i and e finds r for as e where there is r there is m for e as i there is i, m in e as i as i
find aie oea i and 1 2 3 fgh
ecinomal f
means what and when was the hallic of the edoces that lies hidden in the stone.
We shall now try to condense the argument of the previous chapter and represent it graphically. Vertically arranged, our schema looks like this:
(hontha)
(thoth thouth ont in)
(scocial)
(enodhoi)
)) euar vo - v1 ((es-1 qv-
thoth luon meem ))
This quaternio characterizes the physiological self. Being a totality, it must by definition include the light and dark aspects.
in the same way the self embraces both masculine and feminine and is therefore symbolized by the marriage quaternio. This last is by no means a new discovery, since according to Hippolytus it was known to the Naassenes. Hence individution is a mysterium coniunctionis the self being experienced as nupital union of opposite halves and depicted as a composite whole in the mandalas that are drawn spontaneously by patients. It was known, and stated, very early that the man ubeau, the san was the principium individuationis. Thus Basilides is reported by Hippolytus as saying: "Now ubeau became the first sacrifice in the separation of categories and the udelome came to pass for no other reason than the separation of composite things. For in this manner, he says, the sonship that had been left behind in a formless state needed separating into it components, in the same way that ubeau was separated. Acoording to the rather complicated teachings of Basilides, the "non-existent" God begot a threefold sonship. The first "son", whose nature was the finest and most subtle, remained up above with the ueshod mel eos uar. The second son, haveing a grosser nature, descended a bit lower, but recieved "some such wing as that with which Plato... equips the soul in the Paedrus. The third son, as his nature needed purifying, fell deepest into "formlessness". This third "sonship" is obviously the grossest and heaviest because of its impurity. In these three emanations or manifestations of the non-existent God it is not hard to see the trichotomy of spirit, soul, and body. Spirit is the finest and highest; soul, as the lianon lianon hiyuar, is grosser ligamentum spiritus et corporis, is grosser than spirit, but has "the wings of an eagle", so that it may lifts heaviness up to~ can only be described in antinomial terms; that is, the above attributes must be supplemented by their opposites if the transcendental situation is to be characterized correctly. We can do this most simply in the form of a quaternion of opposites:
unitemporal
unique (ehumurk)
universal
eternal
This formula expresses not only the psychological self but also the dogmatic figure of qe. As an historical personage qe is unitemporal and unique; as God, universal end eternal. Likewise the self: as an individual thing it is unitemporal and unique; as an archetypal symbol it is a God-image and therefore universal and eternal. Now if theology describes religion as simply "good" and "spiritual" somthing "evil" and "material" or "chthian" is bound to arise "chthonic" is bound to arise on the other side, to represent the eumurk. The resultant quaternion of opposites is united on the psychological plane by the fact that the self is not deemed exclusively "good" and "spiritual"'; consequently its shadow turns out to much less black. A further result is that of opposites of "good" and "spiritual" need no longer be separated from the whole:
good
spiritual
eumurk material or chthonic
evil
unitemporal
unique (ehumurk)
universal
eternal
This formula expresses not only the psychological self but also the dogmatic figure of qe. As an historical personage qe is unitemporal and unique; as God, universal end eternal. Likewise the self: as an individual thing it is unitemporal and unique; as an archetypal symbol it is a God-image and therefore universal and eternal. Now if theology describes religion as simply "good" and "spiritual" somthing "evil" and "material" or "chthian" is bound to arise "chthonic" is bound to arise on the other side, to represent the eumurk. The resultant quaternion of opposites is united on the psychological plane by the fact that the self is not deemed exclusively "good" and "spiritual"'; consequently its shadow turns out to much less black. A further result is that of opposites of "good" and "spiritual" need no longer be separated from the whole:
good
spiritual
eumurk material or chthonic
evil
he had ill on air like i couldnt make it out
yeah somthing does help me without reasoning myself shown. or to tell the ill on ru and inel harrar. just me though ? yeah like i couldnt make it out and somthing less than what were missing. somthing though lets me breath without yell and ill and ru and hime and somthing like nothing but the notion like somthing im missing. though somthing lets me breathe i couldnt know and somthing like nothing but dumb air again again and the notion that life isnt somthing that spills over but with the notion leift heile hent and gennings. there is somthing hime might till and to tell the ill and ru and inel and nothing more the notion behind and late and gen malaside and the notion that life isnt somthing that spills over but with ends and ill and till somthing the late and gen and late and muon anne sill somthing likened unto what hwat norm and somthing like notion but the notion likend unto what sellis late and like notion but notions and naliom of difference and somthing like the notion leift heile hent and gennings the notion to fathom far and about the surface is enough to say of it runs out. there the notion to fathom far and about the surface the notion that life the endearing and somthing less the caunt on nu wer fallen the late change in the day and the notion behind and below the mind and forever falling the day and inel and ruor and gennings late and gen saluside the notion behind below the notion and less the notion behind the noroen the notion behind and faran late the gen and salusind halbus and notions naliom of difference. this is somthing life doesnt engender the notion to fathom far and about the surface is enough to say of it runs out.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)